Research service 2
Reveal mechanisms.
Investigate the biological programmes behind response, candidate targets and potential escape mechanisms, to guide your next experiments.
Questions it answers
- Which regulators and pathways could drive the differences observed?
- Which targets or combinations deserve experimental follow-up?
- Where are the therapeutic gaps in the profiles studied?
What we need from you
- Expression data from your models, samples or public cohorts
- The biological question and any prior hypotheses
- Existing experimental results to cross-check, if available
What you receive
- Ranked mechanistic hypotheses with the supporting evidence
- Candidate targets and regulators, flagged by confidence level
- Suggested experiments (models, readouts, controls)
- Explicit uncertainties and alternative explanations
Example report outline
Illustrative example — fictitious content, not Recanthia results.
- 1. Biological question and scope
- 2. Regulatory network and pathway analysis
- 3. Candidate regulators and targets, with evidence grades
- 4. Possible escape mechanisms
- 5. Experimental plan proposal
How a project runs
Scoping, feasibility, analysis, interpretation and delivery — each step agreed with you. See our method and data practices →
Turnaround and price are agreed during scoping, depending on the data and the question. See an example report on synthetic data →
Results are research hypotheses. They are not a diagnosis, a clinical recommendation or a validated predictive test.
Discuss a pilot like this
Tell us about your candidate, data and question. We will come back with a scoping proposal.